« July 2009 | Main | September 2009 »

August 29, 2009

Inspiration or Desperation?

Isn't that a fabulous title? It is also, thanks to Academic over at Journeys of an Academic, the theme of this month's Scientiae. Academic writes:

I have been thinking about office decorations as new people move into assorted spaces. Every office seems to be dominated by those people who put up cheesy positive slogans like "Teamwork: Coming together is a beginning, keeping together is a progress, working together is success - Henry Ford" which invariably seem to be balanced against the person posting a message designed to mock these things like "Teamwork: Share Victory, Share Defeat." Invariably, the semester start brings a time to reflect positively or sarcastically. Talk amongst yourselves and submit the posts in the usual fashion by Friday 4 Sept. The carnival will be my Labor Day gift to you.

Same rules as always to submit. Now let's see; should I be perky or sarcastic?

August 27, 2009

Calling all GeoScientists: Time's a wasting

As you may recall from an earlier post, we are conducting a survey to help us learn more about how blogs might help in the recruitment and retention of women and minorities in the geosciences. We will be discussing our results at the GSA session on "Techniques and Tools for Effective Recruitment, Retention and Promotion of Women and Minorities in the Geosciences” as well as in our respective blogs.

So if you are a geoscientists (defined as being a member of GSA, AGU, AAG, AMS, ASLO, their international counterparts, or similar organizations); celebrate the end of summer (our drop dead date is 9/7/09) by spending a couple of minutes completing a short survey. And if you're not a geoscientist, please pass the link on to your favorite geoscientists.

To start the survey, just click here.

Thanks

August 26, 2009

Good bye Teddy and thank you

I wasn't going to post about Teddy Kennedy's death because there sure has been a lot of coverage; but Greg Laden asked us for our favorite stories about Teddy Kennedy and as one who was born and bred in MA and returned to live in MA in my mid30's, I have so many stories.

My grandfather knew (and didn't like) Joe Kennedy (those stories are for another post) and when I was a child, my priest's housekeeper told me it would be a sin "to support Jack Kennedy for president just because he was Catholic" (I was 12). As I grew up I heard all the Teddy stories (both the funny and the bad ones). However, as I became an adult I became increasingly aware of the differences he was making in our everyday lives--including in my own when because of Kennedy Kassebaum my sister's cancer treatment was covered by insurance.

I always said I wouldn't want my sister to marry him (although actually that may have been better than.... sorry bad digression) but I was damn glad he was my senator. He made the world better, I thank him and so morn his loss.

BTW my favorite Teddy Kennedy story--we met him in his office and he had pictures taken. He sent one of me, my sister and our whole families to my mother with a signed note thanking her for raising such a fine bunch of Democrats. Her response was "Democrats;I'm no Democrat"; but she kept the picture and showed it to everyone who visited.


Good bye Teddy and thank you.

August 25, 2009

Want a job?

This is not a title you see much in this economy; but thanks to the nice people at the National Institutes of Health, we and our partners at Northwestern have two job openings: Social Science Research Associate (4 years). and Social Scientist Research Associate/Postdoctoral Fellow (2 years).

I am so excited about this study-- we are looking at the processes and criteria young women are using to make career decisions in the biological/biomedical sciences, especially related to academic careers, as they progress from undergraduate into PhD training, comparing students with different ethnicities in women's colleges, colleges and universities with strong Women in Science (WIS) programs, Historically Black Colleges and Universities, and other colleges and universities and to compare the career decision-making processes of these women with a broad and diverse sample of men in these schools, and women and men in NIH: NIGMS-sponsored programs.

If you are interested, keep reading, the job descriptions are below,

Social Science Research Associate

This new position provides a unique opportunity to play a key role in the initiation of a new national,
interview-based qualitative research study of the career decision-making processes of women in the sciences.
The longitudinal study will start with undergraduates and follow them into PhD programs. In addition to
managing the study, the individual will conduct a portion of the interviews and lead the analysis of interview
data. The selected individual will join and work collaboratively with a dynamic group of six qualitative
researchers engaged in multiple studies of the development of young scientists. Primary responsibilities will
include:
1. Coordination of communication/scheduling for interviews at colleges and universities around the U.S.
2. Management of a large amount of interview, text and demographic data
3. Communication with individual students participating in the study over a multi-year period
4. Management of IRB review and approvals for participating colleges and universities
5. Interviewing students at their campuses and by phone in follow-up interviews
6. Leading interview data analysis using qualitative research methods
7. Leading development of reports and publications of research results
8. Modest financial management, such as travel reimbursement, purchase order processing, etc.

This position requires an individual with the following background, skills and characteristics:
1. A PhD in a social science field or education, utilizing qualitative research methods, or a masters degree
and equivalent work experience with progressive levels of responsibility
2. Experience managing a research study or similar ongoing project
3. The ability to communicate effectively with a wide array of individuals, from college students to senior
level faculty and university administrators
4. A high level of attention to detail and the strict requirements for research involving human subjects
5. Flexibility of thinking to blend grounded theory and theoretically framed interpretive approaches
6. Maturity and the ability to work both collaboratively and independently as needed
7. Sufficient schedule flexibility to permit extensive travel during portions of each year
8. Interviewing and interpersonal skills to relate to perspectives of individuals from many different
educational, ethnic and social backgrounds
9. Experience with qualitative research software is desirable but not essential

This is a grant-funded position of at least four years duration with the hope to continue the study for eight
years or more. Salary will be commensurate with background and experience, up to the level of a
postdoctoral fellow/junior research associate. A full package of benefits equivalent to that of other
Northwestern University employees will be provided.

Interested applicants should contact and/or send CV, along with a cover letter indicating four ways they
believe they meet the qualifications for this position, to:
Rick McGee, Ph.D.
Associate Dean, Faculty Affairs
Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine
Chicago, IL 60611
r-mcgee@northwestern.edu
312-503-1737
Northwestern University is an Affirmative Action, Equal Opportunity Employer. Women and minorities are encouraged to apply. Hiring is contingent upon eligibility to work in the United States.”

Social Scientist Research Associate/Postdoctoral Fellow Position

This new position provides a unique opportunity to make a major contribution to the understanding of how
students considering careers in scientific research make decisions about future careers. Funded by a twoyear
grant from the National Institutes of Health through the American Recovery & Reinvestment Act, the
selected individual will join and work collaboratively with a dynamic group of six qualitative researchers
engaged in multiple studies of the development of young scientists. The primary role for the person in this
new position will be to study, synthesize, and integrate multiple social science and education theories and
interpretive frames with respect to how they can be used to explain career decisions of young scientists. The
integrated interpretive frame will be used as a new ‘lens’ through which to analyze a large volume of
interview-based qualitative research data. The data will come from longitudinal studies of the career
decision-making of over 500 students, starting as juniors in college. The person selected will work
collaboratively and independently to:
1. Expand our initial literature search of multiple social science fields for research and theories that might
contribute insights into how science students view and make choices about careers, especially focusing
on issues contributing to underrepresentation of women and minorities in science
2. Compile and annotate the literature base
3. Construct an integrated interpretive frame from the identified theories and previous research
4. Participate in the analysis of interview data from the career decision-making research studies
5. Begin creation of a resource describing the integration for use by both researchers in the field and
practitioners involved in programs and interventions to promote science careers
6. Lead preparation of quarterly reports and publications, as appropriate

This position requires an individual with the following background, skills and characteristics:
1. A PhD in a social science field or education utilizing qualitative research methods, or a masters degree
and qualitative research experience
2. Expertise and deep knowledge in their field and the capacity to learn and interpret the theories, and
evidence behind them, in other fields
3. Strong ability to synthesize information from multiple perspectives seeing how it coalesces or diverges
4. Flexibility of thinking to use multiple approaches for data analysis
5. Maturity and the ability to work both collaboratively and independently as needed
6. Experience creating web pages that link and display information is preferred but not required
This is a two year, grant-funded position available immediately. Salary will be commensurate with
background and experience, up to the level of a postdoctoral fellow/junior research associate. A full package
of benefits equivalent to that of other Northwestern University employees will be provided.
Interested applicants should contact and/or send CV, along with a cover letter indicating four ways they
believe they meet the qualifications for this position, to:
Rick McGee, Ph.D.
Associate Dean, Faculty Affairs
Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine
Chicago, IL 60611
r-mcgee@northwestern.edu
312-503-1737
Northwestern University is an Affirmative Action, Equal Opportunity Employer. Women and minori

August 19, 2009

Data.gov

Last week when I was presenting on evaluation for the Quality Education for Minorities Network (QEM), I was thinking I needed to update our FairerScience tool, Finding the Numbers.. Now that FairerScience friend David Mortman has introduced me to Data.gov, the priority of doing that update has increased greatly.

Data.gov doc is a real find. Let me quote:

The purpose of Data.gov is to increase public access to high value, machine readable datasets generated by the Executive Branch of the Federal Government. As a priority Open Government Initiative for President Obama's administration, Data.gov increases the ability of the public to easily find, download, and use datasets that are generated and held by the Federal Government. Data.gov provides descriptions of the Federal datasets (metadata), information about how to access the datasets, and tools that leverage government datasets. The data catalogs will continue to grow as datasets are added. Federal, Executive Branch data are included in the first version of Data.gov.

I would write more ut I've got to go take the tutorial.

Thanks Mort!

August 16, 2009

Being a trainer of trainers: Wisdom from a 7 year old

Seven year old Seth is teaching me how to catch with a glove; something I've never done before. He is an excellent trainer (he has me starting with a softball, after which we will go to a hardball). Seth has explained the stages of expertise to me and what it takes to get to each level. The levels for softball are: beginning, basic, difficult, expert and, if you want to, trainer. Once you are an expert in softball , you can then go to hardball. In hardball, you go back to beginner and then go through the same levels. You can become a hardball trainer and once you are a good trainer in BOTH softball and hardball, you can become a trainer of trainers. Today I made it through beginner and part of the way though basic. Tomorrow hey maybe I'll get to difficult.

Seth is very clear about what I need to know to pass each level and even more clear that I can't become a trainer until I have mastered all the levels. He also says I can't be a trainer of trainers until not only have I proved i can do it; I have to show that I can train others to do it.

The concept of trainer of trainers has been with us in education and in STEM outreach for a long time. In some instances it has been successful; in many more it hasn't. If more people adopted Seth's structures of what it takes to be a trainer of trainers, I'm figuring there would be a lot more success.

August 14, 2009

Ok I know I don't do these kinds of posts but....

Here is a letter I just sent ot the CEO of Marriott. BTW anything that is within () was added for the post == hey what can I say; I'm a researcher; everything has to be accurate

Dear Mr. Marriott: {that's correct -- his name is Bill Marriott)

As you can tell from our rewards numbers below, my husband, Tom Kibler, and I spend a lot of time in Marriott hotels. Indeed several years ago, we spent some time in the Stamford Marriott mentioned in this link.

While the service in that hotel was fine; what indeed we expect from Marriott; I found the parking garage was not a comfortable place and, even though I regularly travel by myself; not a place I was willing to go without my husband. Part of my concern was because driving from the hotel to visit a friend in Westport, we found that several blocks away from the hotel was, what we found out later to be, a well known drug buying and selling spot.

I understand that we need to be aware of the environment around us and to be careful of our personal safety. I also feel that when we are staying at a hotel chain with a Marriott reputation we should be able to expect reasonable security. The idea that when someone is attacked and raped in a Marriott faculty, Marriott's response is not to look at security but rather to blame the victim and seek to embarrass her and shame her is unconscionable. In any case this is an awful response; in such a case when the woman was raped in front of her children—well words fail me.

So now I am in a position where I'm afraid to stay at a Marriott property by myself. Not only will you not protect me; you will go after me if something happens to me while I am staying at your property. And since that is the case, then of course when I am traveling with my family we will no longer stay at Marriotts. The sad part for both you and us is that we really like your hotels and when we had a choice we stayed at them and now we no longer feel comfortable doing so.

Sincerely

Patricia B. Campbell, PhD
Marriott Rewards number XXXXXXXX (remember I'm the privacy freak)

Tom R. Kibler
Marriott Reward number (see above)

August 07, 2009

Scientiae is up

Even if, or maybe especially if, it has been a tough summer, drift on over to Abel Pharmboy’s for this month’s Scientiae and learn how others are, and aren’t, handling the summer.

I continue to be in awe of my science blogger friends and how they make it all happen. Now if only we could figure out a way to schedule a little more fun into the mix.

PS thank you Abel—you’ve done a great job on this (I was going to say a seminal job; but that would have been too much even for me)

August 05, 2009

Calling all GeoScientists: 404 error

Hi folks:

If you submitted the survey and got a 404 error- I am so sorry. We have it fixed now but lost your data. If you do it again and send me an e-mail, I'll send you cookies

Patt

Over the past several years, the geoscience blogosphere has blossomed so much that this fall, the Geological Society of America (GSA) will be convening a Pardee Keynote Symposium called “Google Earth to Geoblogs: Digital Innovations in the Geosciences.” Kim Hannula started wondering how blogs serve women geoscientists. Kim recruited the rest of us and we decided to approach this problem as scientists – by collecting data and analyzing the results. Specifically, we’d like to know how blogs might help in the recruitment and retention of women and minorities. We plan to discuss our results at the GSA session on "Techniques and Tools for Effective Recruitment, Retention and Promotion of Women and Minorities in the Geosciences.” We have designed a survey, gone through the Institutional Review Board process (completely foreign to us geologists), and now we need help from you.
We are asking you to complete a short (5- 10 mins), anonyomous, survey. The survey focuses on your participation with science blogs, why you read science blogs and what you gain from reading science blogs. It will also ask you to list blogs you find to be particularly useful and a little about yourself. No questions are required, all are optional.

We are primarily interested in the responses of women and minority geoscientists, but non-minority men, please feel free to fill out the survey as well. Your answers will be a useful point of comparison. Note also that we are definining geosciences rather broadly. If you are or can be a member of GSA, AGU, AAG, AMS, ASLO, their international counterparts, or similar organizations, please consider taking the survey.

All the data collected are anonymous and no individuals can or will be identified. Your participation in this study is completely voluntary. You are free to withdraw at any time without having any negative affect. If you have questions concerning the study, please contact Dr. Anne Jefferson at ajefferson (at) uncc (dot) edu.

To start the survey, just click here.

Sincerely,
Anne Jefferson
Kim Hannula
Pat Campbell
Suzanne Franks